Huck,

At risk of speculation the linked article seems to allude to a magic wonder cartridge. Is this more rainbow flavored unicorn poop or is there actually a major step forward in existence?

Second out of my lane question: Is there a tangible, objective advantage to the rifle and SAW using the same round? The linked article alludes to compromises made when shoehorning cartridges into two applications. How often is SAW ammo actually delinked and reused in M4 mags or vice versa?

It may be old news, but from my understanding the Army said they want to keep the 6.8 caliber bullet(.277) but they are looking for a cartridge that is not the SPC. At least from the design criteria that I thought I saw floating around somewhere was the same .277 caliber bullet in the weight range of the SPC, but in a lighter cartridge weight at a higher velocity and pressure limit to still allow penetration of armor at extended ranges. I have seen proposed pictures of a telescoping/steel-brass cartridge in the wild but no real performance reports. As much as I would love to see the military adopt the 6.8 SPC II as a cartridge, I have a feeling Remington screwed the pooch with the initial chamber issues during military testing(IMO as a 6.8 owner).

Add Reply

Likes (1)
David Reeves
Post
Copyright Lightfighter Tactical Forum 2002-2019
×
×
×
×
×